Due to recent discussion surrounding my postings under the Holy
Bejebus section I thought I should weigh in. It should go without saying that I am all for people posting whatever they want to the site. I have tried to encourage, cajole, prompt, and elicit postings from people for the past two years so if you have something to say or something sparks you then by all means please, please, please post it!
With that said, a few items:
1. Holy
Bejebus - Never really thought people read that section all that often, I even posted a poll at one time to gauge readership and found out, much to my dismay, that the section was basically ignored. Hell, not everyone votes on the polls for crying out loud. That said,
RTS posts stuff to Holy Bejebs and I do regularly as a method of honing my 'one-liners' for my upcoming comedy tour. I welcome anyone to post anything to that section or to take what they read and make an actual post.
2. "Your
Gov't At Work" - Not really sure what problem there is with this. The genesis of it stems from libertarian roots that the floor of the
f'ing House of Representatives is not a time to recognize a
goddam boy scout troop from New
Ulm or, more likely, pay back some "political
constituents" by recognizing "The On-Premise Sign Industry" or declaring "National Train Day." To think that this doesn't really take up all that much time and/or there are not "political reasons" for this kind of crap is wrong. As a taxpayer I elect these people to execute the people's business, glad-handing and photo-Ops with Arnold Palmer, while
totally cool, doesn't seem like the people's business to me.
3. Regarding "The
Blumenthal Incident" - I think of myself as rather fair-handed in my disgust for politicians who distort the truth for their benefit. Eight years of the
Republicans and Bush and then the last year plus with the Democrats changing nothing about DC have worn me down to think of the majority of these people as
grifters in nice suits. I want both parties to be called to the mat.
RTS brought up my continued punishment of one "Give 'em Hell Michelle" and repeatedly
referring to her as a
nutjob (that might have been a time to check facts, right?) Yes, this might be a time to talk about the New York Times and why they chose to 'draw the line here' but that very statement would lead me to wager they lean a bit more left than right, no? You also need to watch this video (
click here) where at the 40 second mark he pretty clearly trades on "the days I served in Vietnam." All well and good that he has gone on to "clarify" things saying he served in the reserves during the era, but
c'mon, to say it was a "misstatement" is absurd. He knew exactly what he was doing -- he was trying to puff up his credentials to look like he had the resume of a war vet. Call it what you want ("fetishization") but it is kind of a big deal when people risk their lives when serving our country and they get a special spot on the pedestal that you and I don't get to stand on. When someone like
Blumenthal tries to stand up on that pedestal then I am going to post something to the Holy
Bejebus section that says they are a "piece of shit."